0 votes
in Computers & Internet by

Like Windows 2000, maybe? On one hand, they probably have nothing to gain from doing that, but I don't think they have anything to lose, either. What do you think?

4 Answers

0 votes
by (1.2k points)

No.

I think if you were able to look at the current source code for Windows (including 8.1), you would find that there is a lot of code that is unchanged or only lightly modified since Windows 2000.

It's not like they started with a blank slate when they began working on XP and Server 2K3. Or even Win8.

So they would be opening up source that is still part of the current code base.

I also dread to think what would happen if the did. Win 2K isn't so ancient that the open source community couldn't take it and make a usable in 2014 OS out of it. I'm sure it would be done. More than once. And you would end up with the tangled mess you have in in Linux world, where you have a whole bunch of different flavors of an OS that are almost but not quite the same. Yuck.

I suppose they could release DOS or Win 3.x. Although I bet there are fragments of that code that still remain here and there. And who would want it?

0 votes
by (4.8k points)

You can find almost all older OS online to download. Im assuming you own them and i cant give you any specific sites as that would break the TOS of yahoo but just do a google search and you will find them.

0 votes
by

No. Real programmers would laugh at them.

Seriously, no: there's too much legacy code still around and MS are notoriously mean anyway.

0 votes
by (11.7k points)

Why would they do something they made no money on? Use a bit of common sense.

Welcome to zQuestions Q&A, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of the community.
...